Corrections & Errata Policy

Published: March 2026 • Last Reviewed: September 14, 2026

At VelocityVerify, we hold our data and editorial reporting to rigorous scientific standards. When factual errors, calculation discrepancies, or hardware specification inaccuracies occur, our policy is to correct them immediately, transparently, and publicly.

Transparency Guarantee: We never quietly alter substantive factual errors or benchmark calculations without publishing a clear, dated editor note or changelog entry.

1. How We Handle Corrections

We classify corrections into three distinct categories based on severity and impact on the reader:

2. Retesting and Errata Verification

If a manufacturer or ISP claims our published test results diverge from their internal data, we follow a standardized verification protocol:

  1. We request the manufacturer's exact testing topology, firmware release, and packet capture logs.
  2. The maintainers attempt to reproduce the issue using the published site and documented test conditions.
  3. If our original measurement contained an environmental flaw or firmware anomaly, we issue an immediate correction and re-publish the updated findings alongside a transparent explanation.
  4. If our independent measurements remain valid, we uphold our findings and may publish the manufacturer's response as a supplemental perspective.

3. Public Errata Log Format

All substantive corrections include a standardized record containing:

4. How to Report an Error

We actively welcome reader scrutinization and technical feedback. If you identify a discrepancy, broken calculation, or outdated specification anywhere on VelocityVerify, please contact our editorial team:

Please include the exact URL, the paragraph or table in question, and any supporting documentation or packet captures. We review and respond to technical error reports within two business days.